The hip bridge is a simple and practical field assessment that can be used to monitor hip extension endurance, posterior-chain endurance and pelvic control. It is commonly used in fitness, sport, rehabilitation-adjacent exercise settings and performance monitoring because it is easy to set up, requires minimal equipment and can be repeated over time.
The double-leg version is less demanding and may be useful as an entry-level bridge endurance test. The single-leg version is more demanding and allows left-right comparison.
The result should not be used alone to diagnose hip pain, low back pain, glute weakness, injury risk or readiness. It should be interpreted with symptoms, hip ROM, lower-limb strength, hamstring bridge testing, trunk endurance and functional movement.
Test name: Hip Bridge Endurance Test
Common versions: Double-leg hip bridge, single-leg hip bridge, timed hold, repetition test
Category: Hip extension endurance / posterior-chain endurance / pelvic control
Primary score: Hold time in seconds or valid repetitions completed
Best use: Baseline testing, side-to-side comparison, retesting and progress tracking
Key limitation: Results are protocol dependent and should not be interpreted as isolated glute endurance
The Hip Bridge Endurance Test assesses the client’s ability to hold or repeatedly perform a bridge position while maintaining pelvis and trunk control.
Common versions include:
Double-leg hip bridge hold
Double-leg hip bridge repetitions
Single-leg hip bridge hold
Single-leg hip bridge repetitions
Elevated hip bridge
Loaded hip bridge if intentionally standardised
The exact setup must be recorded because foot position, knee angle, bridge height, tempo, side tested and stopping criteria all influence the score.
The Hip Bridge Endurance Test may be used to assess:
Hip extension endurance
Gluteal endurance contribution
Posterior-chain endurance
Pelvic control
Trunk and lumbopelvic control
Side-to-side differences in the single-leg version
Baseline and retest change
Symptom response during bridge loading
Progress after endurance or strength training blocks
It is most useful when combined with related findings such as hip range of motion, lower-limb strength, balance, hamstring bridge testing, hop testing and symptoms.
The primary score is either hold time in seconds or valid repetitions completed.
The result may reflect:
Hip extension endurance
Gluteal and posterior-chain contribution
Pelvis control
Trunk control
Side-to-side endurance difference
Fatigue tolerance
Pain or symptoms
Cramping
Familiarisation and motivation
It should not be described as an isolated glute test because hamstrings, trunk, pelvis and foot position can all influence performance.
The test may be useful for:
General fitness clients
Runners
Field and court sport clients
Gym and strength-training clients
Clients completing posterior-chain endurance monitoring
Professionals wanting a low-equipment baseline test
Professionals tracking side-to-side differences using a single-leg version
Clients progressing from basic bridge control to more demanding endurance tasks
It may not be appropriate if the client cannot tolerate the bridge position, experiences cramping immediately, has high pain irritability, cannot maintain safe pelvis control or cannot perform the test with consistent form.
Mat or flat surface
Stopwatch or Measurz stopwatch
Measurz rep counter for repetition-based testing
Measurz metronome for cadence-controlled protocols
Optional bench, box or step for elevated variations
Optional Measurz AR measurement for foot distance, bench height or setup consistency
Optional inclinometer for pelvis or trunk position
Optional MAT tools such as Muscle Meter or Anker for related isometric hip extension testing
Measurz platform for side, hold time, reps, symptoms, cramping, compensation and retest comparison
For timed holds, use the Measurz stopwatch. For repetition-based versions, the Measurz rep counter and metronome can support consistent scoring and cadence.
The client lies supine with both feet on the floor.
Record foot position, knee angle and arm position.
Ask the client to lift the pelvis into a bridge position.
Start timing once the correct position is achieved.
The client maintains pelvis height without excessive lumbar extension, pelvic rotation, cramping or symptom increase.
Stop when pelvis position is lost, symptoms become unacceptable, compensation occurs or the client chooses to stop.
Record hold time and reason for stopping.
The client lies supine in the selected bridge setup.
The client performs controlled bridge repetitions through the selected ROM.
Use a consistent tempo if comparing over time.
Count valid repetitions until form failure, cadence failure, reduced ROM, symptoms, cramping or voluntary stop.
Record repetitions, tempo and reason for stopping.
The client lies supine with one foot on the floor.
Record the side tested.
The opposite leg is lifted according to the selected protocol.
Ask the client to lift the pelvis into a bridge position.
Start timing once the correct position is achieved.
The client maintains pelvis level and avoids pelvic drop, trunk rotation or cramping.
Stop when position is lost, symptoms increase, compensation occurs or the client chooses to stop.
Record hold time, side tested and reason for stopping.
Repeat on the opposite side after consistent rest.
The client lies supine in the selected single-leg setup.
Record the side tested.
The client performs controlled single-leg bridge repetitions.
Use a consistent tempo if comparing over time.
Count valid repetitions until form failure, cadence failure, pelvis drop, cramping, symptoms or voluntary stop.
Repeat on the opposite side after consistent rest.
Record:
Version: double-leg or single-leg
Score type: hold time or repetitions
Side tested if single-leg
Hold time or repetitions completed
Foot position
Knee angle
Bridge height
Tempo or cadence
Pain or symptoms
Cramping
Pelvis control
Compensations
Reason for stopping
Retest date
A higher score generally suggests better hip bridge endurance under the chosen protocol. However, interpretation should consider setup, fatigue, symptoms, cramping, pelvis control, ROM and familiarity.
The most useful comparisons are:
Baseline versus retest
Left versus right in single-leg testing
Double-leg versus single-leg tolerance
Hip bridge compared with hamstring bridge performance
Symptom response across sessions
Published bridge endurance values depend on protocol. The single-leg bridge has stronger recent research support than many double-leg bridge versions, while double-leg results are often used more as a practical entry-level baseline.
A simple field guide for hold-based testing is:
60+ seconds: strong current tolerance
30–59 seconds: moderate current tolerance
15–29 seconds: developing current tolerance
Under 15 seconds: low current tolerance
For repetition-based versions:
30+ valid repetitions: strong current endurance
15–29 valid repetitions: moderate current endurance
5–14 valid repetitions: developing current endurance
Under 5 valid repetitions: low current endurance
These are practical guide ranges only. Baseline comparison, side-to-side comparison, symptom response and protocol consistency are more important than rigid cut-offs.
Bridge endurance testing can provide useful clinical and field information when the setup and stopping criteria are consistent.
Research on gluteal endurance measures has reported support for bridging endurance as a gluteal endurance measure, while newer single-leg bridge studies have explored normative values and clinician assessment accuracy. However, the test should still be interpreted as a bridge endurance task rather than an isolated glute test.
Reliability depends on consistent foot position, knee angle, bridge height, side order, rest period, tempo, instructions and stopping criteria.
Common errors include:
Changing foot position
Changing knee angle
Allowing pelvis drop
Allowing pelvic rotation
Overarching the low back
Counting poor-quality repetitions
Using inconsistent tempo
Ignoring cramping
Not recording side tested
Comparing different bridge versions directly
Continuing after form failure
Using one score to infer injury risk or readiness
Limitations include protocol variability, fatigue, motivation, cramping, learning effect and contribution from several body regions.
The Hip Bridge Endurance Test can help professionals:
Monitor hip extension endurance
Track posterior-chain endurance
Compare left and right sides
Record pelvis control under fatigue
Track response to training
Identify compensation patterns
Compare hip bridge and hamstring bridge results
Use a low-equipment test for repeatable progress tracking
It is most useful when interpreted alongside hamstring bridge testing, hip thrust testing, leg curl testing, lower-limb strength, balance, hop testing, symptoms and movement quality.
Record:
Test name
Version: double-leg or single-leg
Side tested if single-leg
Score type: hold time or reps
Hold time or repetitions completed
Foot position
Knee angle
Bridge height
Tempo or cadence
Pain score
Cramping
Symptom location
Pelvis control
Compensation
Reason for stopping
Retest date
Related strength, ROM and endurance results
Use the Measurz stopwatch for timed holds. Use the Measurz rep counter and metronome for repetition-based protocols. AR measurement can help document foot distance or bench height. Inclinometer notes may help record pelvis or trunk position if required.
It measures hip extension endurance, posterior-chain endurance and pelvis control during a bridge task.
No. It may involve the glutes, but hamstrings, trunk, pelvis control and foot position can also influence performance.
Yes, for single-leg versions. Side-to-side comparison is one of the most useful parts of the test.
There is no universal score for every protocol. Use baseline comparison, side-to-side comparison and retesting with the same setup.
Yes. Cramping, pain, fatigue, compensation and reason for stopping should all be recorded.
The Hip Bridge Endurance Test assesses bridge-based hip extension endurance and pelvic control.
The primary score is hold time or valid repetitions.
The single-leg version allows useful side-to-side comparison.
The test should not be described as isolated glute endurance.
Setup consistency is essential for meaningful retesting.
Measurz can track time, reps, side, setup, symptoms, cramping, compensation and retest progress.
Filipa, A., Byrnes, R., Paterno, M. V., Myer, G. D., & Hewett, T. E. (2010). Neuromuscular training improves performance on the Star Excursion Balance Test in young female athletes. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40(9), 551–558.
Freckleton, G., Cook, J., & Pizzari, T. (2014). The predictive validity of a single leg bridge test for hamstring injuries in Australian Rules Football players. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(8), 713–717.
Silva, M. F., et al. (2021). The reliability and validity of gluteal endurance measures. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 16(6), 1429–1439.
Worst, H., & Henderson, N. (2026). Establishing normative values and clinician assessment accuracy for the Single Leg Bridge Endurance Test. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 21(1), 34–40.
