The Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test measures how much force a client can produce when flexing the knee against resistance in a position where the hip and knee are commonly set around 90 degrees. It is commonly used to assess isometric hamstring force output in a controlled position.
This test can provide useful context for sprinting, running, deceleration, jumping, landing, change of direction, field sport, court sport, posterior-chain strength profiling and progress tracking. The main contributors include biceps femoris, semitendinosus and semimembranosus, with hip position, pelvis control, trunk position and lower-leg contact point influencing the result.
The Muscle Meter is a handheld dynamometry tool used to measure force output during push, pull and isometric strength assessments. When used on its own, the Muscle Meter primarily measures peak force, which is the highest force value produced during the test. When used with Measurz, Muscle Meter data can be recorded and analysed with a broader set of strength and force-time metrics, including peak force, impulse, torque, rate of torque development, rate of force development, time to peak and fatigue index.
For routine Hamstring 90-90 testing, peak force is usually the main metric. Force as a percentage of body weight may be useful if directly calculated from the client’s test force and body weight, especially for baseline comparison, side-to-side comparison and retesting. Rate of force development and time to peak may be useful when rapid hamstring force production matters, such as sprinting, deceleration, change of direction and high-speed running. Impulse may be useful if sustained knee flexion force over a defined time window is intentionally tested. Fatigue index is only relevant if repeated or sustained hamstring efforts are part of the protocol.
The result can support assessment reasoning and progress tracking, but it does not diagnose hamstring strain, tendon injury, sciatic nerve involvement, posterior thigh pain, sprinting readiness or readiness for sport or work on its own.
The Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test is an isometric knee flexion assessment where the client attempts to pull the heel or lower leg into the Muscle Meter, strap or fixed setup without visible joint movement. The test is commonly performed with the hip and knee positioned around 90 degrees, although the exact setup should be recorded.
The movement direction is knee flexion. The purpose of the test is to measure how much hamstring force the client can produce in a specific hip and knee position.
Consistent setup matters because hip angle, knee angle, pelvis position, trunk position, device placement, lower-leg contact point, strap angle and client effort can all affect the result. This test measures force output in a specific setup. It does not fully measure sprinting ability, running mechanics, hamstring tissue capacity, endurance, eccentric strength, tendon status or sport/work readiness on its own.
Explain that the test measures how strongly they can pull the heel or lower leg back into the Muscle Meter. Record baseline symptoms, posterior thigh discomfort, knee symptoms, hip symptoms, lower-back symptoms, fatigue, recent sprinting or training exposure, workload and confidence with maximal effort.
Use at least one submaximal practice trial so the client understands the direction of force and learns to build force smoothly.
A common setup is supine or seated with the hip and knee positioned around 90 degrees. The exact position may vary depending on the original test protocol, available equipment and whether a fixed or handheld setup is used.
Record:
Supine, seated or other position
Test side
Hip angle
Knee angle
Pelvis position
Trunk position
Foot and ankle position
Device contact point
Whether a strap or fixed anchor was used
If the test is performed supine, keep the pelvis stable and avoid hip shifting. If performed seated, keep the trunk stable and avoid leaning backward or using the arms to create force.
For a handheld setup, the professional holds the Muscle Meter against the posterior lower leg, ankle or heel region while the client pulls into knee flexion. For stronger clients or improved repeatability, a strap-stabilised or fixed setup is often preferred.
If using a strap, record:
Anchor point
Strap angle
Strap length
Device position
Limb position
Whether any pre-tension was used
Whether the anchor moved during testing
Push, pull, handheld and strap-stabilised scores should be recorded separately unless the protocol supports direct comparison.
Place the Muscle Meter against the posterior lower leg, ankle or heel region, depending on the chosen protocol. Use the same contact point at retest. Avoid uncomfortable pressure on bony or sensitive areas.
The client should pull into knee flexion, as if trying to bring the heel toward the body, while the device or strap resists movement.
Stabilise the thigh, pelvis and trunk so the client does not compensate with hip extension, hip flexion, pelvis rotation, trunk movement, foot pushing or whole-body bracing.
The aim is controlled knee flexion force in the 90-90 position.
Use consistent instructions such as:
“Pull your heel back into the device as hard as you can and hold.”
“Build up smoothly, then pull hard.”
“Keep your hip, pelvis and trunk still.”
“Do not lift your hips or twist your body.”
“Keep breathing.”
“Tell me if you feel pain, cramping, tingling or anything unusual.”
Use the same wording at retest where possible.
Use 1–2 practice trials, then record 2–3 maximal trials. A common contraction duration is 3–5 seconds. Rest for 30–60 seconds between trials, or longer if symptoms, fatigue or cramping occur.
Record whether the final score uses the best trial or the average of recorded trials. Either approach may be used if it is applied consistently.
Repeat or mark a trial as invalid if:
The hip angle changes
The knee angle changes before the effort
The pelvis lifts or rotates
The trunk leans or shifts
The foot pushes instead of the knee flexors pulling
The device slips
The strap or anchor moves
Pain or cramping limits effort
The client starts before the device is ready
The client holds their breath excessively
The professional cannot hold the device steady
Record posterior thigh pain, cramping, knee symptoms, hip symptoms, lower-back symptoms, paraesthesia, confidence, apprehension and symptom response after testing. Do not repeatedly test through high pain, worsening symptoms or severe cramping.
For retesting, match the same position, hip angle, knee angle, device placement, strap setup, instructions, contraction duration, rest period, scoring method and symptom recording.
The Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test is used to quantify isometric hamstring force output in a repeatable hip and knee position. It may be useful for:
Baseline hamstring strength assessment
Side-to-side comparison
Monitoring change over time
Posterior-chain strength profiling
Comparing hamstring and quadriceps strength where relevant
Supporting sprinting, running and deceleration assessment reasoning
Supporting change-of-direction, jumping and field sport assessment reasoning
Fitness and performance progress tracking
Workplace context where lifting, climbing, carrying or repeated lower-limb loading is relevant
Client education
The test should support assessment reasoning. It should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic or clearance measure.
The test primarily measures isometric knee flexion force output in the chosen 90-90 setup. It reflects the client’s ability to produce hamstring force while maintaining the chosen hip, knee and pelvis position.
It may provide useful information about:
Hamstring force capacity
Side-to-side force difference
Force relative to body weight, if calculated
Confidence producing hamstring force
Pain response during resisted knee flexion
Change in force over time
Relationship between strength and related movement tasks
It does not directly measure:
Hamstring tissue healing
Cause of posterior thigh pain
Sciatic nerve involvement
Sprinting mechanics
Eccentric hamstring capacity
Running readiness
Return-to-sport readiness
Work readiness
A higher score may suggest greater hamstring force output in that specific 90-90 setup. A lower score may suggest reduced knee flexion force output, but the reason should be interpreted carefully.
Lower force may be influenced by pain, apprehension, poor familiarisation, fatigue, guarding, cramping, inconsistent device placement, poor pelvis stabilisation, reduced confidence, recent sprint exposure, posterior thigh symptoms, knee symptoms or compensation from the hip or trunk.
One result should not be interpreted in isolation. Interpretation is strongest when the same setup is repeated over time and reviewed alongside symptoms, confidence, knee flexion range, hip range, quadriceps strength, hip extension strength, running exposure, sprinting, jumping, deceleration and work-specific demands.
Important influences include:
Pain
Apprehension
Poor familiarisation
Fatigue
Cramping
Guarding
Hip angle
Knee angle
Pelvis position
Trunk position
Device placement
Strap angle
Lower-leg contact point
Foot and ankle position
Breath holding
Client confidence
Professional strength if using handheld resistance
Published Muscle Meter-specific universal norms for the Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test are limited. Reference values should therefore be used as context only and not as direct targets unless the protocol is closely matched.
More user-friendly comparison data include:
The original Hamstring 90-90 article focuses on using the test to assess hamstring strength and endurance at a 90-degree knee flexion angle, but broad universal Muscle Meter norms are not established for every population.
A systematic review of isometric knee flexion and extension strength found that reference values vary substantially by device, knee angle, hip angle, age, sex and test method. This means broad hamstring values should be interpreted cautiously.
For older adults, pooled mid-range knee flexion values have been reported around 0.69–0.89 Nm/kg for males and 0.46–0.81 Nm/kg for females. These are torque-based review values, so they should be treated as background context only, not as Muscle Meter force targets.
For a Muscle Meter 90-90 setup, user-friendly interpretation is usually stronger when using the client’s own baseline, side-to-side difference, percentage of body weight if calculated, symptoms and repeated testing under the same setup.
For side-to-side comparison, a difference of around 10% or more is often worth reviewing more closely, especially if it matches symptoms, previous injury, confidence changes, sprint exposure or functional differences. This is not a strict pass/fail cut-off.
If force is recorded as a percentage of body weight in Measurz, use it mainly for the client’s own baseline, side-to-side comparison and retesting. Bodyweight percentage is useful only when calculated from the client’s actual test force and body weight.
If hamstring-to-quadriceps comparison is used, record the exact knee flexion and knee extension protocols because different joint angles can change the apparent ratio.
These values and comparisons are best used as context. They can help structure interpretation, but they should not be used as diagnostic, clearance or pass/fail cut-offs.
Use this order:
Compare with the client’s own baseline.
Compare right and left sides when relevant.
Review force relative to body weight where calculated.
Compare hamstring and quadriceps strength where relevant.
Consider symptoms during and after testing.
Consider confidence and effort quality.
Review whether compensations were present.
Compare with related strength, mobility or performance tests.
Relate the result to running, sprinting, jumping, sport, work or daily-life demands.
Retest under the same conditions to monitor change.
Do not use reference values as pass/fail criteria.
Peak force
Use for maximum hamstring force output, baseline strength, side-to-side comparison, progress tracking and comparing force across retests. Look for best score or average score, consistent setup, side-to-side difference, change from baseline, pain response and compensation during maximal effort.
Force as percentage of body weight
Use when calculated directly from test force and body weight. It may help compare the client’s result to their own baseline, the opposite side and body size. Do not treat it as a universal target unless the comparison data use a closely matched protocol.
Torque
Use only when the lever arm is measured and a more biomechanical interpretation is needed. It can help when lower-leg length or device placement changes the raw force reading. It should not be used as normative data unless the reference data match the setup closely.
Rate of force development
Use when rapid hamstring force matters, such as sprinting, deceleration, landing or change of direction. Look for early force production and whether rate of force development changes while peak force stays similar.
Time to peak
Use to understand whether force is produced quickly or gradually. Look for delayed peak force, faster time to peak across retests, and whether a slower time reflects caution, pain, poor cueing or an actual performance difference.
Impulse
Use only if a defined sustained force window is intentionally tested. Look for whether the client can sustain knee flexion force briefly and whether impulse improves while peak force stays similar.
Fatigue index
Use only if repeated or sustained hamstring efforts are part of the protocol. Look for drop-off across repeated trials, symptom-related fatigue and whether fatigue improves across a training block.
Youth clients
Consider growth, maturation, coordination, attention, training age and familiarisation. Practice trials are important because maximal hamstring effort can be difficult to coordinate without pelvis or trunk movement.
Adults and general fitness clients
Use the test for baseline hamstring strength, progress tracking and confidence with loading. Compare results with hip extension strength, quadriceps strength, lower-limb mobility and general exercise goals.
Older adults
Consider walking confidence, stairs, transfers, balance, fatigue, rest periods and function. A lower score may provide useful context, but it should not be interpreted without functional assessment.
Athletes and sport clients
Consider sprinting, running, deceleration, jumping, cutting and field or court sport demands. Peak force alone does not equal sport performance, but it can support a broader lower-limb strength profile.
Workplace and manual task clients
Consider lifting, carrying, stairs, ladders, uneven ground, walking distance and repeated lower-limb loading demands. Do not use one score to clear work duties.
Clients returning after injury
Use the test to monitor force output, confidence and symptom response. Strength alone should not confirm readiness.
Clients with pain or persistent symptoms
Pain, fear, guarding, fatigue, apprehension and confidence may reduce force. Record symptom response carefully and compare with related tests.
Higher body mass clients
Absolute force and force relative to body mass may both be useful. Interpret results in relation to goals, symptoms and functional demands, not assumptions about body size.
Repeatability improves when the same setup is used each time. Record and standardise:
Same body position
Same hip angle
Same knee angle
Same pelvis position
Same trunk position
Same lower-leg contact point
Same device placement
Same strap setup, if used
Same anchor height and distance, if straps are used
Same strap angle, if straps are used
Same stabilisation
Same instructions
Same contraction duration
Same rest period
Same scoring method
Same symptom and compensation recording
Hamstring strength testing is setup-dependent. Small changes in hip angle, knee angle, lower-leg contact point or pelvis control can change the score. For stronger clients, handheld resistance may be limited by professional strength. Strap-stabilised or fixed setups can improve repeatability.
Common errors include:
Hip angle changing
Knee angle changing before the effort
Pelvis lifting or rotating
Trunk leaning
Foot or ankle pushing instead of knee flexion
Device placement changing between trials
Strap or anchor movement
Breath holding
Testing through high pain or cramping
Comparing different knee angles directly
Treating the score as a diagnosis
Limitations include:
Testing is setup-dependent
Manual resistance may be limited by professional strength
Muscle Meter-specific universal norms may be limited
Published knee flexion values vary by device, hip angle, knee angle and population
Pain, fear or guarding can reduce force output
Peak force does not measure eccentric hamstring capacity
Strong symmetry does not automatically indicate readiness for sprinting, sport or work
The Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test may be useful for:
Baseline hamstring strength assessment
Side-to-side comparison
Monitoring response to exercise or intervention
Comparing hamstring and quadriceps strength where relevant
Supporting sprinting, running and deceleration assessment reasoning
Comparing with hip extension strength, jumping, sprint exposure and workload
Sport and workplace strength profiling
Client education
Fitness and performance progress tracking
If force is low on both sides, consider assessing hip extension strength, quadriceps strength, hamstring mobility, sprint exposure, recent workload and confidence with loading.
If one side is much lower, compare with symptoms, injury history, hip and knee mobility, sprinting, jumping, deceleration, single-leg tasks and work or sport demands.
If pain or cramping limits the result, record symptom location and review whether hip angle, knee angle, device placement or effort level needs modification.
If force is good but function is limited, compare with sprint exposure, deceleration, jumping, running tolerance, posterior-chain endurance, workload and task exposure.
If the client is improving, keep the same test setup and monitor whether force, symptoms, confidence and function improve together.
Position: Supine, seated or selected 90-90 position, with pelvis and trunk controlled
Start position: Hip and knee commonly positioned around 90 degrees, exact angles recorded
Joint or trunk angle: Record hip angle, knee angle, pelvis and trunk position
Trials: 1–2 practice trials, then 2–3 recorded trials
Contraction duration: 3–5 seconds
Rest: 30–60 seconds between efforts
Metric: Peak force, plus percentage of body weight if directly calculated
Attachment or device setup: Muscle Meter against posterior lower leg, ankle or heel region, with consistent contact point; strap-stabilised if used
Final score: Best trial or average of trials
Key retesting requirement: Same body position, hip angle, knee angle, device placement, instructions, contraction duration, rest and scoring method
It measures isometric knee flexion force output in a specific hip and knee position.
The 90-90 position provides a repeatable way to test hamstring force with the hip and knee both flexed. It can be useful for comparing sides and tracking change over time.
It can be if you calculate it directly from test force and body weight. This is useful for internal comparison, especially when tracking change over time.
Published universal Muscle Meter norms for this exact protocol appear limited. Baseline, side-to-side comparison and repeated testing are usually more useful.
Broad knee flexion reference data exist, but values vary by protocol. Older-adult review values include mid-range knee flexion around 0.69–0.89 Nm/kg for males and 0.46–0.81 Nm/kg for females, but these are torque-based background values rather than Muscle Meter force targets.
No. It can measure force output and symptom response, but it does not diagnose a condition or explain symptoms on its own.
Changing hip angle, knee angle, pelvis position, device placement, pain, fatigue, cramping and inconsistent instructions can affect results.
Record side, body position, hip angle, knee angle, device placement, peak force, percentage bodyweight if calculated, symptoms, compensations, confidence, scoring method and related findings.
The Hamstring 90-90 Strength Test measures isometric knee flexion force output.
Peak force is usually the main routine Muscle Meter metric.
Published knee flexion reference data vary by hip angle, knee angle, device and population.
Percentage of body weight should only be used when calculated directly from force and body weight.
Baseline comparison, side-to-side comparison and retesting consistency are usually more useful than broad norms.
Reference values provide context, not diagnostic or clearance cut-offs.
Measurz should capture setup, symptoms, bodyweight-normalised values where calculated, compensations and retesting conditions.
Baron, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., & Roy, J.-S. (2024). Validity and reliability of handheld dynamometry to assess isometric knee muscle strength in healthy adults. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 33(4), 267–276.
Krause, D. A., Neuger, M. D., Lambert, K. A., Johnson, A. E., DeVinny, H. A., & Hollman, J. H. (2014). Effects of examiner strength on reliability of hip-strength testing using a handheld dynamometer. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 23(1), 56–64.
Marušič, J., Šarabon, N., & others. (2021). Establishing reference values for isometric knee extension and flexion strength. Frontiers in Physiology, 12, 767941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.767941
McKay, M. J., Baldwin, J. N., Ferreira, P., Simic, M., Vanicek, N., Burns, J., & 1000 Norms Project Consortium. (2017). Normative reference values for strength and flexibility of 1,000 children and adults. Neurology, 88(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003466
Opar, D. A., Piatkowski, T., Williams, M. D., & Shield, A. J. (2013). A novel device using the Nordic hamstring exercise to assess eccentric knee flexor strength: A reliability and retrospective injury study. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 43(9), 636–640. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2013.4837
