The Talar Tilt Test assesses inversion laxity and endpoint quality at the ankle, commonly related to calcaneofibular ligament involvement and lateral ankle instability. A positive finding may include increased inversion tilt, soft endpoint, apprehension or familiar lateral ankle symptoms compared with the other side. A 2022 systematic review found that physical examination tests for ankle instability, including talar tilt, vary in reliability and validity, supporting cautious interpretation and side-to-side comparison.
A client reports lateral ankle pain or instability after an inversion sprain. They may have swelling, tenderness, difficulty cutting or reduced confidence on uneven ground. The anterior drawer test may assess anterior talar translation, while the Talar Tilt Test helps assess inversion stress response.
The test should be interpreted carefully. Pain is not the same as laxity, and natural side-to-side variation can affect the result.
Test name: Talar Tilt Test
Also known as: Inversion Stress Test
Body region: Lateral ankle, subtalar/talocrural region, calcaneofibular ligament context
Purpose: Assess inversion laxity, endpoint quality and symptom response
Positive finding: Increased inversion tilt, soft endpoint, apprehension or familiar lateral ankle symptoms compared with the other side
Negative finding: No meaningful side-to-side difference, firm endpoint and no familiar instability response
Best used with: Anterior Drawer of the Ankle, palpation, ankle ROM, swelling, balance and hop/function testing
Key limitation: It does not confirm a CFL tear or injury grade on its own
The Talar Tilt Test is a manual ankle inversion stress test. The professional stabilises the lower leg and moves the calcaneus and talus into inversion to assess side-to-side laxity and endpoint.
It is often used after lateral ankle sprain and in chronic ankle instability assessment.
The test is used to assess lateral ankle ligament involvement, especially when calcaneofibular ligament involvement or inversion laxity is suspected.
It may be relevant after ankle sprain, repeated rolling, cutting injuries, uneven-ground instability or persistent lateral ankle symptoms.
The test assesses inversion tilt, endpoint quality and symptom response. It does not directly visualise the CFL, ATFL or subtalar structures.
Pain may come from ligament injury, joint irritation, swelling, peroneal tendon symptoms, sinus tarsi symptoms or guarding.
This test may be useful for athletes, runners, dancers, hikers, court-sport players and clients with inversion sprain history or chronic ankle instability symptoms.
Use when lateral ankle ligament involvement is relevant and inversion stress testing is safe.
In acute injury, consider fracture risk, pain irritability and swelling before testing.
Use caution with suspected fracture, inability to weight bear, severe swelling, severe pain, recent surgery, obvious deformity, high irritability or neurological symptoms.
Do not force inversion stress.
Treatment table or chair
Pain scale
Measurz recording workflow
Optional comparison-side notes
Optional swelling and function notes
Position the client sitting, supine or side-lying depending on the method used. Record the method.
The ankle is relaxed and may be positioned near neutral or slight plantarflexion depending on the intended ligament bias.
Stand or sit facing the foot.
Stabilise the distal tibia and fibula with one hand. Hold the calcaneus and rearfoot with the other.
Keep the lower leg stable and avoid rotating the entire limb.
Apply a gradual inversion stress to tilt the talus and calcaneus.
Ask the client to report pain, apprehension, instability, symptom location and whether symptoms are familiar.
A positive finding is increased inversion tilt, a soft endpoint, apprehension or familiar lateral ankle symptoms compared with the other side.
A negative finding is no meaningful side-to-side difference, firm endpoint and no familiar instability response.
Stop if pain increases sharply, guarding prevents assessment, instability feels excessive or symptoms are not tolerated.
Compare sides and record pain, tilt and endpoint separately.
A positive Talar Tilt Test may increase suspicion of lateral ankle ligament involvement when increased inversion tilt or a softer endpoint is present compared with the other side. It is more meaningful when it matches the injury mechanism, swelling, tenderness and functional instability symptoms.
Pain alone does not confirm laxity. A negative test reduces suspicion of inversion laxity in the tested position but does not exclude lateral ankle ligament injury, especially if swelling, pain or guarding is present.
A 2022 systematic review found that manual physical examination tests for ankle instability and sprain, including talar tilt, have variable reliability and validity. No test demonstrated robust reliability and validity across included studies.
Condition or presentation: lateral ankle sprain, CFL involvement or chronic ankle instability
Population: people with suspected ankle sprain or instability
Test variation: manual talar tilt/inversion stress test
Reference standard: variable across studies, including imaging, stress radiography and clinical criteria
Sensitivity: variable and not suitable for one universal value here
Specificity: variable depending on study and test definition
Positive likelihood ratio: not consistently available for one standardised method
Negative likelihood ratio: not consistently available for one standardised method
Key limitations: examiner force, ankle position, subtalar contribution, pain guarding, natural laxity and inconsistent reference standards
A systematic review of ligamentous ankle injury tests noted that suspected lateral ligamentous injury is still commonly assessed using palpation and manual stress tests such as anterior drawer and talar tilt, but diagnostic accuracy evidence remains limited by methodological factors.
Reliability depends on ankle position, force level, subtalar control, endpoint grading, comparison side and examiner experience.
Validity improves when interpreted with anterior drawer testing, palpation, swelling, injury mechanism and functional instability measures.
Common errors include forcing inversion, not comparing sides, interpreting pain as laxity, ignoring subtalar contribution and failing to record endpoint quality.
Limitations include swelling, guarding, pain sensitivity, natural laxity, examiner force variation and difficulty isolating specific ligaments.
Use the Talar Tilt Test to document inversion laxity and lateral ankle symptoms. It can guide bracing, balance progressions, return-to-sport testing and referral decisions when instability is marked.
Record test name, side tested, result, pain score, symptom location, ankle position, force direction, inversion tilt grade if used, endpoint quality, apprehension, swelling, comparison side, confidence in result and reason for stopping.
Add related findings such as anterior drawer, palpation tenderness, ankle ROM, peroneal tests, balance, hop tests, prior sprain history and return-to-sport notes.
Anterior Drawer of the Ankle
Prone Anterior Drawer Test
Eversion Stress Test
Peroneus Longus and Brevis Tests
Ankle Inversion Test
Ankle Eversion Test
Single Leg Calf Raise
Balance and Proprioception Tests
It assesses inversion laxity, endpoint quality and symptom response at the ankle.
A positive result may include increased inversion tilt, a soft endpoint, apprehension or familiar lateral ankle symptoms compared with the other side.
No. It may support suspicion but does not confirm a ligament tear or injury grade on its own.
Pain should be recorded, but pain alone is not the same as mechanical laxity.
Record side, pain, ankle position, inversion tilt, endpoint quality, apprehension, swelling and comparison side.
The Talar Tilt Test assesses inversion laxity and endpoint quality.
Pain and laxity should be recorded separately.
It does not confirm a CFL tear on its own.
Evidence supports cautious interpretation and side-to-side comparison.
Measurz should capture position, symptoms, tilt, endpoint and comparison findings.
Beynon, A. M., Le May, S., & Théroux, J. (2022). Reliability and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 30, 58.
Netterström-Wedin, F., & Bleakley, C. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests assessing ligamentous injury of the talocrural and subtalar joints: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Health.
