A gym client may want to track upper-body pulling strength more objectively. A field sport athlete may need a repeatable way to monitor upper-back and arm pulling capacity. A strength programme may use the bench row to assess horizontal pulling strength while reducing the trunk and lower-back contribution seen in unsupported bent-over rows.
The Bench Row Repetition Maximum Test provides a controlled way to assess rowing strength using a consistent bench angle, body position, grip, ROM and loading setup. Rather than requiring a true 1RM attempt, the test can be performed using a submaximal repetition maximum, such as a 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM. The load and reps are then entered into Measurz to calculate the estimated 1RM.
The result is useful for strength tracking, but it should not be interpreted as a complete measure of back function, shoulder health, grip capacity, rowing performance, injury risk or sport readiness.
The Bench Row Repetition Maximum Test measures the heaviest load a client can row for a defined number of repetitions using a bench-supported rowing movement.
Depending on the protocol, this may be a 3RM, 5RM, 8RM, 10RM or another repetition maximum. The repetition target should be clearly recorded.
The test may be performed using:
Chest-supported dumbbell bench row
Chest-supported barbell bench row
Incline bench row
Seal row
Bench-supported cable row
Bench-supported machine row
Other standardised bench-supported horizontal row setup
In Measurz, the professional records the load and completed repetitions. Measurz then calculates the estimated 1RM from that result. This estimated 1RM can be used to monitor progress over time and guide loading decisions.
If the client performs a true single-repetition maximum, the result should be labelled as a directly measured 1RM. If the result is calculated from a submaximal load and repetitions, it should be labelled as an estimated 1RM.
This test is used to assess horizontal pulling strength and track upper-body strength changes over time.
It may be useful for gym clients, athletes, general fitness clients and upper-body strength programmes where bench-supported rowing strength is a meaningful monitoring variable.
It is especially useful when the professional wants a strength estimate without requiring a true maximal 1RM attempt. A submaximal RM test can be more practical for many clients while still giving a useful estimated 1RM through Measurz.
The test measures bench row performance under the selected setup.
It may reflect:
Horizontal pulling strength
Upper-back and arm pulling contribution
Scapular retraction strength contribution
Grip and handle tolerance
Control through the selected ROM
Load tolerance
Pain or symptom response
Estimated 1RM progress across training blocks
Training load progression
It does not measure complete back function, isolated latissimus dorsi strength, isolated rhomboid or trapezius strength, shoulder health, grip strength, sport performance or injury risk on its own.
This test may be useful for gym clients, athletes, general fitness clients, upper-limb strength clients and anyone completing pulling-strength training.
It may not be appropriate when shoulder, elbow, wrist or grip symptoms increase during rowing, the client cannot maintain a repeatable bench-supported position, the test cannot be performed through a consistent ROM, or the client is not ready for maximal or near-maximal repetition testing.
Bench, incline bench, seal-row bench or chest-supported row setup
Dumbbells, barbell, cable, machine or other standardised load
Measurz for recording load, reps and estimated 1RM
Optional metronome
Optional video
Optional bench-angle note or marker
Optional grip or attachment note
Choose the bench row setup
Decide whether the test will use dumbbells, barbell, cable, machine, seal row or another clearly defined bench-supported row setup.
Record the setup
Record bench type, bench angle, chest support position, grip type, grip width, load type, starting arm position, finishing position, ROM, tempo and load method.
Choose the repetition target
Select the repetition maximum target, such as 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM. Use the same target for retesting where possible.
Define valid ROM
Set a clear start and finish range. A valid repetition should use the same pulling range each time without lifting the chest from the bench, jerking the load, shrugging excessively, shortening ROM or losing control on the return.
Warm up
Complete light warm-up sets. Increase load gradually before testing.
Perform the test
Ask the client to complete the selected repetition maximum with controlled movement and the defined ROM.
Stop the attempt
Stop when the client reaches the target reps, cannot complete another valid rep, loses ROM, uses unacceptable compensation, reports limiting symptoms or cannot maintain control.
Record the maximum successful set
The score is the heaviest load completed for the target repetition range with acceptable technique and ROM.
Enter load and reps into Measurz
Record the completed load and repetitions in Measurz. Measurz calculates the estimated 1RM from the entered result.
Record the load, reps and exact bench row setup. Measurz uses the completed load and reps to calculate the estimated 1RM.
The estimated 1RM should be interpreted as an estimate, not the same as a directly tested 1RM. If a true 1RM was performed, label it as directly measured. If the result comes from a submaximal load and repetitions, label it as estimated.
Interpretation should include:
Absolute load
Completed repetitions
Estimated 1RM
ROM
Bench type and angle
Grip and attachment
Tempo
RPE
Pain or symptoms
Compensations
Previous baseline
A lower estimated 1RM may suggest reduced bench row performance under the tested setup, but it does not identify the cause. Pain, fatigue, shoulder position, grip, bench angle, chest support, confidence, recent training and technique may all influence the result.
No universal normative value should be applied across bench row setups and populations. Bench row results vary by bench angle, chest support, dumbbell versus barbell loading, cable versus free-weight setup, grip, ROM, tempo, body size, training history and whether the 1RM is directly measured or estimated.
Use baseline comparison and progress across sessions as the primary benchmarks.
If a single-arm bench row is tested, side-to-side comparison can be useful, but it should not be treated as a strict pass/fail rule. A noticeable difference between sides should be interpreted alongside symptoms, grip strength, shoulder function, training history and related upper-limb strength findings.
Bench-supported row scores should not be compared across different bench angles, equipment types or loading methods unless the setup is carefully matched.
Common errors include changing bench angle, changing grip, using inconsistent ROM, lifting the chest off the bench, shrugging excessively, jerking the load, using momentum, failing to control the return, changing tempo, testing while fatigued, not recording symptoms and comparing results across different row variations.
A common recording error is failing to distinguish between a directly measured 1RM and an estimated 1RM. When load and reps are entered into Measurz, the result should be described as an estimated 1RM unless a true 1RM was directly tested.
The main limitation is that the test measures bench-supported row performance only. It does not fully assess shoulder function, back function, grip strength, pulling endurance, sport performance or injury risk.
Use this test to monitor upper-body horizontal pulling strength, guide training loads and track response to strength training programmes.
The estimated 1RM can help track progress across training blocks, adjust loading and compare results across retests when the same setup is repeated.
It is most useful when interpreted alongside seated row, lat pulldown, pull-up or chin-up performance, grip strength, shoulder strength, upper-limb symptoms and movement quality.
Record protocol type, bench type, bench angle, chest support position, load type, grip width, grip type, ROM, tempo, load, reps, RM target, estimated 1RM, RPE, pain score, symptom location, compensation notes, reason for stopping and retest date.
Useful notes include shortened ROM, chest lift, excessive shrugging, jerking, grip limitation, shoulder discomfort, pain-limited stop, tempo failure, fatigue-limited attempt or setup change.
The key Measurz workflow is:
Enter the completed load
Enter the completed reps
Review the estimated 1RM calculated by Measurz
Record bench setup, grip, ROM, symptoms, RPE and compensations
Use the same protocol for retesting
It measures loaded bench-supported horizontal pulling strength under the selected row setup.
The professional enters the completed load and reps into Measurz. Measurz uses this information to calculate the estimated 1RM.
Not unless the client completed a true 1RM. If the result is based on load and multiple repetitions, it should be labelled as an estimated 1RM.
No. A bench row uses chest or bench support and may use dumbbells, barbell, cable or a machine. A seated row is usually performed from a seated cable or machine setup.
Only cautiously. Load distribution, grip, ROM and setup can change the score.
Yes. Bench angle strongly affects body position, pulling path and ROM, so it must be recorded and repeated.
Yes. Pain score, symptom location, grip limitation, ROM and whether symptoms limited the result should be recorded.
No. A 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM may be more appropriate for many clients. Measurz can use load and reps to estimate 1RM.
The Bench Row Repetition Maximum Test measures bench-supported horizontal pulling strength.
Measurz calculates the estimated 1RM from the recorded load and reps.
Bench angle, support, grip, load type and ROM must be repeated for meaningful retesting.
Do not treat an estimated 1RM as the same as a directly measured 1RM.
Do not treat the result as a complete shoulder, back or pulling profile.
Record load, reps, setup, grip, ROM, symptoms and RPE in Measurz.
Grgic, J., Lazinica, B., Schoenfeld, B. J., & Pedisic, Z. (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum strength assessment: A systematic review. Sports Medicine - Open, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z
Hoeger, W. W. K., Hopkins, D. R., Barette, S. L., & Hale, D. F. (1990). Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 4(2), 47–54.
Nuzzo, J. L., Pinto, M. D., Nosaka, K., & Steele, J. (2023). Maximal number of repetitions at percentages of the one repetition maximum: A meta-regression and moderator analysis of sex, age, training status, and exercise. Sports Medicine, 53, 2281–2302.
Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., & Stone, M. H. (2018). The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations. Sports Medicine, 48(4), 765–785.
