A gym client may want to monitor posterior-chain strength more objectively. A field sport athlete may need trunk and hip-extension strength tracking as part of a broader lower-limb programme. A client returning to back-extension loading may need a practical way to monitor progress without relying on a true maximal single repetition.
The Back Extension Repetition Maximum Test provides a controlled way to assess loaded back extension performance using a standardised 45-degree back extension, horizontal back extension, Roman chair, glute-ham developer or machine setup. Rather than requiring a true 1RM attempt, the test can be performed using a submaximal repetition maximum, such as a 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM. The load and reps are then entered into Measurz to calculate the estimated 1RM.
The result is useful for strength tracking, but it should not be interpreted as a complete measure of spinal health, back pain, hip-extension strength, hamstring function, injury risk or return-to-sport readiness.
The Back Extension Repetition Maximum Test measures the heaviest load a client can complete for a defined number of repetitions using a back extension movement.
Depending on the protocol, this may be a 3RM, 5RM, 8RM, 10RM or another repetition maximum. The repetition target should be clearly recorded.
The test may be performed using:
45-degree back extension
Horizontal back extension
Roman chair
Glute-ham developer back extension
Machine back extension
Loaded bodyweight back extension
Other standardised trunk-extension or hip-extension setup
In Measurz, the professional records the load and completed repetitions. Measurz then calculates the estimated 1RM from that result. This estimated 1RM can be used to monitor progress over time and guide loading decisions.
If the client performs a true single-repetition maximum, the result should be labelled as a directly measured 1RM. If the result is calculated from a submaximal load and repetitions, it should be labelled as an estimated 1RM.
This test is used to assess loaded back extension performance and track strength changes over time.
It may be useful for athletes, gym clients, runners, field sport clients and strength programmes where trunk-extension or posterior-chain loading is a meaningful monitoring variable.
It is especially useful when the professional wants a strength estimate without requiring a true maximal 1RM attempt. A submaximal RM test can be more practical for many clients while still giving a useful estimated 1RM through Measurz.
The test measures back extension performance under the selected setup.
It may reflect:
Loaded trunk-extension performance
Hip-extension contribution
Posterior-chain loading capacity
Back extensor loading tolerance
Control through the selected ROM
Pain or symptom response
Estimated 1RM progress across training blocks
Training load progression
It does not measure spinal health, back pain cause, isolated erector spinae strength, isolated glute strength, isolated hamstring strength, work capacity, injury risk or sport readiness on its own.
This test may be useful for gym clients, athletes, lower-limb strength clients, field sport athletes and people completing trunk or posterior-chain strengthening programmes.
It may not be appropriate when loaded extension causes unacceptable pain, the client cannot maintain a repeatable setup, the test cannot be performed through a consistent ROM, symptoms increase during loaded trunk or hip extension, or the client is not ready for maximal or near-maximal repetition testing.
45-degree back extension, horizontal back extension, Roman chair, glute-ham developer, back extension machine or other standardised setup
External load, plate, dumbbell, barbell, weight vest or machine load stack
Measurz for recording load, reps and estimated 1RM
Optional metronome
Optional video
Optional ROM marker or setup notes
Choose the back extension setup
Decide whether the test will use a 45-degree back extension, horizontal back extension, Roman chair, glute-ham developer, machine back extension or another clearly defined setup.
Record the setup
Record equipment type, pad height, hip position, foot position, load position, ROM, tempo and whether the movement is performed with more trunk extension, hip extension or a combined pattern.
Choose the repetition target
Select the repetition maximum target, such as 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM. Use the same target for retesting where possible.
Define valid ROM
Set a clear start and finish range. A valid repetition should use the same ROM each time without bouncing, excessive momentum, uncontrolled lumbar extension or shortened range.
Warm up
Complete light warm-up sets. Increase load gradually before testing.
Perform the test
Ask the client to complete the selected repetition maximum with controlled movement and the defined ROM.
Stop the attempt
Stop when the client reaches the target reps, cannot complete another valid rep, loses ROM, uses unacceptable compensation, reports limiting symptoms or cannot maintain control.
Record the maximum successful set
The score is the heaviest load completed for the target repetition range with acceptable technique and ROM.
Enter load and reps into Measurz
Record the completed load and repetitions in Measurz. Measurz calculates the estimated 1RM from the entered result.
Record the load, reps and exact back extension setup. Measurz uses the completed load and reps to calculate the estimated 1RM.
The estimated 1RM should be interpreted as an estimate, not the same as a directly tested 1RM. If a true 1RM was performed, label it as directly measured. If the result comes from a submaximal load and repetitions, label it as estimated.
Interpretation should include:
Absolute load
Completed repetitions
Estimated 1RM
ROM
Setup
Tempo
RPE
Pain or symptoms
Movement pattern
Compensations
Previous baseline
A lower estimated 1RM may suggest reduced back extension performance under the tested setup, but it does not identify the cause. Pain, fatigue, fear, hip mobility, hamstring tolerance, back discomfort, pad height, load position, confidence, recent training and technique may all influence the result.
No universal normative value should be applied across back extension setups and populations. Results vary by equipment type, pad height, hip position, ROM, load position, movement strategy, tempo, training history and whether the 1RM is directly measured or estimated.
Use baseline comparison and progress across sessions as the primary benchmarks.
Back-extension setups can differ substantially. A 45-degree back extension, horizontal back extension, glute-ham developer and machine back extension should not be compared directly unless the protocol is matched.
Estimated 1RM values should be interpreted as back-extension performance estimates rather than pure maximal back extensor strength.
Common errors include changing pad height, changing load position, using inconsistent ROM, bouncing, using momentum, overextending at the top, rounding excessively at the bottom, changing tempo, testing while fatigued, not recording symptoms and comparing results across different back-extension setups.
A common recording error is failing to distinguish between a directly measured 1RM and an estimated 1RM. When load and reps are entered into Measurz, the result should be described as an estimated 1RM unless a true 1RM was directly tested.
The main limitation is that the test measures loaded back-extension performance only. It does not assess spinal health, diagnose back pain, measure work capacity, confirm injury risk or fully represent posterior-chain function.
Use this test to monitor back extension strength, guide training loads and track response to trunk or posterior-chain strengthening programmes.
The estimated 1RM can help track progress across training blocks, adjust loading and compare results across retests when the same setup is repeated.
It is most useful when interpreted alongside movement quality, symptoms, deadlift strength, hip thrust strength, hamstring strength, trunk endurance and relevant sport or work demands.
Record protocol type, equipment used, pad height, hip position, foot position, load position, ROM, tempo, load, reps, RM target, estimated 1RM, RPE, pain score, symptom location, movement strategy, compensation notes, reason for stopping and retest date.
Useful notes include shortened ROM, momentum, excessive lumbar extension, hip-dominant strategy, trunk-dominant strategy, pain-limited stop, tempo failure, fatigue-limited attempt, confidence limitation or setup change.
The key Measurz workflow is:
Enter the completed load
Enter the completed reps
Review the estimated 1RM calculated by Measurz
Record setup, ROM, symptoms, RPE, movement pattern and compensations
Use the same protocol for retesting
It measures loaded back-extension performance under the selected setup.
The professional enters the completed load and reps into Measurz. Measurz uses this information to calculate the estimated 1RM.
Not unless the client completed a true 1RM. If the result is based on load and multiple repetitions, it should be labelled as an estimated 1RM.
It can provide useful loaded back-extension performance information, but it does not isolate one muscle or measure all back functions.
No. It measures loaded back-extension performance. It does not diagnose the cause of back pain.
Only cautiously. Equipment type, pad height, ROM, load position and movement strategy can change the score.
Yes. Pain score, symptom location, ROM and whether symptoms limited the result should be recorded.
No. A 3RM, 5RM, 8RM or 10RM may be more appropriate for many clients. Measurz can use load and reps to estimate 1RM.
The Back Extension Repetition Maximum Test measures loaded back-extension performance.
Measurz calculates the estimated 1RM from the recorded load and reps.
Setup, pad height, load position and ROM must be repeated for meaningful retesting.
Do not treat an estimated 1RM as the same as a directly measured 1RM.
Do not use the result to diagnose back pain or determine readiness on its own.
Record load, reps, setup, ROM, symptoms, RPE and movement strategy in Measurz.
Grgic, J., Lazinica, B., Schoenfeld, B. J., & Pedisic, Z. (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum strength assessment: A systematic review. Sports Medicine - Open, 6, 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-020-00260-z
Herren, K., et al. (2017). Loading conditions in the spine, hip and knee during different executions of back extension exercises. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 9, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-017-0074-0
Kim, H., et al. (2025). Using 30-s prone back extension repetition maximum test to predict back muscle strength. Healthcare, 13(7), 785.
Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., & Stone, M. H. (2018). The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations. Sports Medicine, 48(4), 765–785.
