The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] measures how much force a client can produce during an isometric two-arm pulling task against a fixed resistance. It is commonly used to assess bilateral upper-body pulling force in a controlled setup. This can provide useful context for rowing, climbing, grappling, carrying, pulling, contact sport, gym-based pulling tasks, manual work and progress tracking.
The Muscle Meter is used to measure force output during the test. When used on its own, the Muscle Meter primarily measures peak force, which is the highest force value produced during the effort. When used with Measurz, Muscle Meter data can be recorded and analysed with broader strength and force-time metrics, including peak force, impulse, torque, rate of force development, time to peak and fatigue index.
For routine Double Arm Pull testing, peak force is usually the main metric. Force as a percentage of body weight may be useful if directly calculated from the client’s test force and body weight, especially for baseline comparison and retesting. Rate of force development and time to peak may be useful when rapid pulling force matters, such as grappling, climbing, rowing starts, swimming starts, contact sport or explosive pulling tasks. Impulse may be useful if sustained force over a defined time window is intentionally tested. Fatigue index is only relevant if repeated or sustained double-arm pulling contractions are part of the protocol.
The result can support assessment reasoning and progress tracking, but it does not diagnose shoulder pain, elbow pain, grip weakness, back pain, nerve injury, injury risk, sport readiness or work capacity on its own.
The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] is an isometric force assessment where the client pulls with both arms against the Muscle Meter without visible movement.
The test can be performed in different positions depending on the goal and available setup. Common options include seated row position, standing pull, half-kneeling pull, split-stance pull, prone pull, supine pull or a task-specific pulling position.
Because setup can vary widely, the result should always be interpreted as a protocol-specific score. A seated bilateral row with elbows at 90 degrees is not the same as a standing double-arm pull, a vertical pull, a deadlift-style pull or a sport-specific grappling-style pull.
Consistent setup matters because body position, shoulder angle, elbow angle, grip, handle type, trunk position, strap angle, anchor point, pulling direction and client effort can all affect the result. This test measures force output in a specific pulling setup. It does not fully measure rowing capacity, pull-up capacity, climbing performance, shoulder health, grip endurance, sport performance or movement quality on its own.
Prepare the client
Explain that the test measures how strongly they can pull with both arms into the Muscle Meter in a fixed position.
Record baseline symptoms, shoulder discomfort, elbow symptoms, wrist or hand symptoms, grip discomfort, neck symptoms, back symptoms, fatigue, recent training and confidence with pulling.
Use at least one submaximal practice trial so the client understands the position, effort and direction of force.
Set the client position
Choose the position that matches your assessment goal.
Record:
seated, standing, kneeling, prone, supine or task-specific position
bilateral handle or two-handle setup
shoulder angle
elbow angle
wrist position
grip type
handle or strap type
trunk position
stance or lower-limb position
support used
anchor height and distance
Set up the Muscle Meter
Set the Muscle Meter so it measures the intended pulling force direction.
This may involve a strap, handle, fixed anchor, wall anchor, door anchor, platform anchor or professional-stabilised setup. Record the exact setup, strap angle, anchor point, strap length and whether the setup moved during testing.
Place the handle, strap or contact point
Position the handle or strap so the client can pull with both arms without slipping, wrist discomfort or excessive grip limitation.
The contact point should be comfortable and repeatable. Record grip type, handle diameter and whether lifting straps or aids were used.
Stabilise the position
Stabilise the trunk and arm position as needed so the effort remains a pull in the intended direction.
Avoid uncontrolled trunk extension, trunk rotation, shoulder shrugging, elbow angle changes, wrist collapse, foot movement or excessive breath holding unless the protocol intentionally includes those features.
Give clear instructions
Use consistent instructions such as:
“Take up the slack.”
“Build up smoothly, then pull as hard as you can and hold.”
“Keep your body position still.”
“Pull evenly through both arms.”
“Keep breathing.”
“Do not jerk the start.”
“Tell me if you feel pain, tingling, cramping or anything unusual.”
Record trials
Use 1–2 practice trials, then record 2–3 maximal trials.
A common contraction duration is 3–5 seconds.
Rest for 60–120 seconds between high-force trials, or longer if symptoms, cramping or fatigue occur.
Record whether the final score uses the best trial or average of recorded trials.
Identify invalid trials
Repeat or mark a trial as invalid if:
the client changes body position
the device slips
the strap or anchor moves
the grip slips
the wrists collapse
the trunk rotates, extends or leans
the elbow angles change substantially
the client jerks the start
pain limits effort
the force direction changes
one arm clearly dominates when equal pull is intended
Record symptoms
Record shoulder pain, elbow pain, wrist or hand pain, neck discomfort, back discomfort, grip discomfort, paraesthesia, cramping, confidence and apprehension.
For retesting, match the same position, handle or strap setup, force direction, instructions, contraction duration, rest period, scoring method and symptom recording.
The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] is used to quantify bilateral pulling force output in a repeatable setup.
It may be useful for:
baseline upper-body pulling strength assessment
monitoring change over time
tracking shoulder-girdle and trunk pulling strength
assessing bilateral pulling force in sport or gym contexts
supporting climbing, rowing, swimming, grappling or contact sport assessment
workplace context where pulling, carrying, bracing or manual tasks are relevant
comparing pulling strength with pushing strength, grip strength, shoulder ROM or scapular strength
client education
The test should support assessment reasoning. It should not be used as a stand-alone diagnostic, capacity or clearance measure.
The test primarily measures isometric double-arm pulling force in the chosen setup.
It may provide useful information about:
bilateral upper-body pulling force capacity
shoulder-girdle force output
trunk bracing contribution
grip contribution
confidence producing pulling force
pain response during resisted pulling
change in force over time
relationship between pulling strength and related functional tasks
It does not directly measure:
pull-up strength
rowing performance
climbing performance
isolated latissimus dorsi strength
isolated scapular strength
grip endurance
shoulder diagnosis
work capacity
sport readiness
A higher score may suggest greater double-arm pulling force output in that specific test setup. A lower score may suggest reduced force output, but the reason should be interpreted carefully.
Lower force may be influenced by pain, apprehension, poor familiarisation, fatigue, grip limitation, shoulder symptoms, elbow symptoms, back symptoms, inconsistent handle position, poor stabilisation, reduced confidence or device movement.
One result should not be interpreted in isolation. Interpretation is strongest when the same setup is repeated over time and reviewed alongside symptoms, confidence, movement quality, related tests and functional goals.
Important influences include:
body position
shoulder angle
elbow angle
wrist position
grip type
handle diameter
trunk position
stance width
anchor height
pull direction
strap length
device placement
pain
fatigue
familiarisation
client confidence
setup stiffness
Published Muscle Meter-specific universal norms for Double Arm Pull testing are limited because the test can be performed in many different positions and force directions.
Because of this, reference values should be used cautiously and only when the test setup, device placement, population and scoring method are closely matched.
For most Measurz use, the most useful comparisons are:
the client’s own baseline
change across retests
force as a percentage of body weight if directly calculated
pain or symptom response
confidence during testing
comparison with related upper-limb and trunk tests
comparison with single-arm pull results when both are tested
Reference values provide context, not diagnostic, work-clearance or sport-clearance cut-offs.
Use this order:
compare with the client’s own baseline
compare with previous double-arm pull results using the same setup
consider symptoms during and after testing
consider confidence and effort quality
review whether compensations or grip limitations were present
compare with single-arm pull testing when relevant
compare with related strength, mobility or performance tests
relate the result to sport, gym, work or daily-life demands
retest under the same conditions to monitor change
do not use reference values as pass/fail criteria
Use for maximum double-arm pulling force output, baseline strength, progress tracking and comparing force across retests.
Look for best score or average score, consistent setup, change from baseline, symptom response and compensation during maximal effort.
Use only when calculated directly from test force and body weight.
This can be useful for sport and gym contexts where pulling relative to body mass matters. Use it for internal comparison and retesting rather than as a universal target.
Torque is usually less practical for a general double-arm pull unless the lever arm and biomechanical model are clearly defined.
Use only when the lever arm is measured and a specific interpretation is needed.
Use when rapid pulling force production matters, such as grappling, contact sport, swimming starts, rowing starts, climbing moves or explosive upper-body tasks.
Look for early force production and whether RFD changes while peak force stays similar.
Use to understand whether force is produced quickly or gradually.
Look for delayed peak force, faster time to peak across retests, and whether a slower time reflects caution, poor cueing, pain or actual performance difference.
Use only if a sustained force window is intentionally tested.
Look for whether the client can produce and sustain force over the selected time window.
Use only if repeated or sustained pulling contractions are part of the protocol.
Look for drop-off across repeated trials and whether fatigue improves across a training block.
Consider growth, maturation, coordination, attention, hand size, training age and familiarity with pulling tasks. Practice trials are important so the client learns to pull without excessive trunk movement or jerking.
Use the test for baseline strength, progress tracking and confidence with pulling force. Compare results with gym goals, grip strength, pull-up capacity and shoulder mobility.
Consider shoulder comfort, grip tolerance, fatigue, daily pulling tasks and confidence. A lower score may provide useful context, but it should not be interpreted without functional assessment.
Consider climbing, grappling, swimming, rowing, contact sport, throwing support tasks and gym pulling demands. Peak force alone does not equal sport performance, but it can support a broader upper-body strength profile.
Consider pulling, carrying, gripping, lifting, bracing and manual handling demands. Do not use one strength score to clear work duties.
Use the test to monitor force output, confidence and symptom response over time. Strength alone should not confirm readiness.
Pain, fear, guarding, fatigue, apprehension and confidence may influence force. Record symptoms carefully and compare with related findings.
Absolute force and force relative to body mass may both be useful. Interpret the result in relation to the chosen setup, goals, symptoms and function.
Repeatability improves when the same setup is used each time.
Record and standardise:
same body position
same shoulder angle
same elbow angle
same wrist position
same grip type
same handle or strap
same trunk position
same stance
same anchor height and distance
same force direction
same device placement
same instructions
same contraction duration
same rest period
same scoring method
same symptom and compensation recording
Recent upper-body isometric push and pull research supports extracting peak force, rate of force development, impulse and time to peak force when the setup is standardised. However, force values are strongly protocol-dependent.
Handheld or portable dynamometry can be reliable when a controlled make-test format and consistent stabilisation are used. Fixed or strap-stabilised setups can improve consistency where available.
Common errors include:
not defining the exact pull direction
inconsistent handle or strap setup
changing shoulder or elbow angle
allowing trunk extension or rotation
allowing shoulder shrugging
allowing grip to slip
device slipping
strap or anchor movement
jerking the start
one arm dominating unintentionally
breath holding
testing through high pain
comparing different pull protocols directly
treating the score as a diagnosis or clearance measure
Limitations include:
testing is setup-dependent
grip may limit the score
bilateral testing can hide side-to-side differences
strap setup requires careful anchor control
Muscle Meter-specific universal norms may be limited
pain, fear or guarding can reduce force output
peak force does not measure endurance or movement quality
pulling force does not automatically predict pull-up, rowing, climbing, sport or work performance
the test does not determine sport or work readiness on its own
The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] may be useful for:
establishing a baseline
tracking bilateral pulling strength over time
reviewing force relative to body weight if directly calculated
monitoring response to exercise or intervention
supporting upper-limb and trunk strength profiling
comparing with grip strength, shoulder strength, push testing and pull-up capacity
comparing with single-arm pull results when appropriate
educating the client about measurable progress
reviewing sport, gym, work or daily-life demands
If force is low, consider assessing grip strength, shoulder ROM, scapular strength, pulling technique, upper-limb strength, trunk control, fatigue and confidence with loading.
If bilateral force is good but one side appears limited during tasks, compare with single-arm pull testing and side-to-side shoulder or grip measures.
If grip limits the result, record it clearly and consider whether grip testing or a strap-assisted version is more relevant to the testing goal.
If pain limits the result, record the pain response and review whether the test position, handle, pressure point or effort level needs modification.
If force is good but function is limited, compare with pulling endurance, rowing capacity, shoulder control, grip, trunk control and sport or work demands.
Position: Standardised seated, standing, kneeling, supine, prone or task-specific double-arm pull position
Start position: Shoulder, elbow, wrist, trunk and stance position recorded
Joint or trunk angle: Record shoulder angle, elbow angle, wrist position and trunk position
Trials: 1–2 practice trials, then 2–3 recorded trials
Contraction duration: 3–5 seconds
Rest: 60–120 seconds between high-force efforts
Metric: Peak force, plus percentage of body weight only if directly calculated
Attachment or device setup: Muscle Meter aligned with intended pulling direction through fixed strap, handle, anchor or stabilised setup
Final score: Best trial or average of trials
Key retesting requirement: Same position, handle setup, force direction, instructions, contraction duration, rest and scoring method
It measures isometric pulling force output from both arms in a specific setup.
No. It measures force against a fixed resistance. Pull-ups and rows involve movement, bodyweight, technique and endurance demands.
It can be if calculated directly from test force and body weight. This may be useful for bodyweight pulling contexts, but it should mainly be used for baseline and retest comparison.
Published universal norms are limited because the test can be performed in many setups. Baseline and retest comparison are usually more useful.
Not by itself. Double-arm testing can hide asymmetry. Use the Single Arm Pull Test if side-to-side comparison is needed.
No. It can contribute to a broader test battery, but it should not be used alone to determine readiness.
Different body position, force direction, handle setup, anchor position, grip, fatigue, pain, compensation and inconsistent instructions can affect results.
Record body position, handle or strap setup, force direction, peak force, percentage of body weight if directly calculated, symptoms, compensations, scoring method and retest conditions.
The Pull Test – Double Arm [Muscle Meter] measures bilateral isometric pulling force.
Peak force is usually the main routine Muscle Meter metric.
The exact setup must be recorded because pull-test results are highly protocol-specific.
Percentage of body weight should only be used when calculated directly from force and body weight.
Double-arm testing can hide side-to-side differences, so single-arm testing may be needed for asymmetry.
Measurz should capture setup, symptoms, bodyweight-normalised values where directly calculated, compensations and retesting conditions.
Aerts, F., Sheets, H., & colleagues. (2025). Reliability and agreement of hand-held dynamometry using three standard rater test positions. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 20(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.128286
Bohannon, R. W. (1986). Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Physical Therapy, 66(2), 206–209.
Curovic, M., Baltezarević, D., & colleagues. (2026). Intraday and interday reliability of horizontal upper body push and pull tests. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/applsci16010026
Moraux, A., Canal, A., Ollivier, G., Ledoux, I., Doppler, V., Payan, C., & Hogrel, J.-Y. (2023). Psychometric properties of a standardized protocol of muscle strength assessment by hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24, 311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06400-2
