Wrist Tinel’s Test assesses whether tapping over the median nerve at the carpal tunnel reproduces familiar median nerve symptoms. A 2023 meta-analysis reported pooled sensitivity of 0.45 and specificity of 0.78 for Tinel’s sign in carpal tunnel syndrome, suggesting low sensitivity and higher specificity compared with some other provocative tests. Clinicians should combine it with history, sensory and motor findings, Phalen’s Test, questionnaires and electrodiagnostic testing when needed.
A client reports tingling, numbness or burning in the thumb, index, middle finger or radial half of the ring finger. Symptoms may occur at night, while driving, while typing, during gripping or when using the phone.
Wrist Tinel’s Test can help assess whether light tapping over the median nerve at the wrist reproduces familiar symptoms. It should be interpreted as one finding in a broader carpal tunnel and median nerve assessment.
Test name: Wrist Tinel’s Test
Also known as: Tinel’s Sign at the Wrist, Carpal Tunnel Tinel’s Test
Body region: Wrist, carpal tunnel, median nerve
Purpose: Assess median nerve symptom reproduction with percussion at the wrist
Positive finding: Familiar tingling, numbness or paraesthesia in the median nerve distribution
Negative finding: No familiar symptoms with tapping
Best used with: Phalen’s Test, sensory testing, grip strength, pinch strength, CTS questionnaires and upper limb neurodynamic testing
Key limitation: Low sensitivity means a negative test does not rule out carpal tunnel syndrome
Wrist Tinel’s Test involves gentle tapping over the median nerve at the carpal tunnel. The test is positive when tapping reproduces familiar median nerve distribution symptoms.
Local wrist tenderness alone is not the same as a positive Tinel’s sign.
The test is used when carpal tunnel syndrome or median nerve irritation at the wrist is suspected.
It may be relevant in clients with hand paraesthesia, nocturnal symptoms, grip changes, work-related wrist symptoms, cycling symptoms, pregnancy-related symptoms or symptoms influenced by wrist position.
It assesses symptom response to percussion over the median nerve at the wrist. It does not measure nerve conduction and does not confirm carpal tunnel syndrome.
Symptoms may also be influenced by cervical radiculopathy, pronator syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, general nerve sensitivity or local wrist pain.
This test may be useful for clients with median nerve distribution symptoms, night symptoms, grip weakness, hand paraesthesia or suspected carpal tunnel involvement.
Use when median nerve symptoms are present and gentle tapping over the wrist is safe.
Use caution with acute wrist trauma, severe pain, marked swelling, recent surgery, open wounds, severe hypersensitivity or progressive neurological deficit.
Pain and symptom scale
Measurz recording workflow
Optional sensory tools
Optional grip or pinch dynamometer
Position the client sitting with the forearm supported and palm facing upward.
The wrist is relaxed and visible.
Sit or stand beside the tested wrist.
Locate the median nerve/carpal tunnel region at the volar wrist.
Support the forearm and avoid excessive wrist pressure.
Gently tap over the median nerve region at the wrist.
Ask the client to report tingling, numbness, burning, electric sensation, pain location and whether symptoms are familiar.
A positive Wrist Tinel’s Test is reproduction of familiar median nerve distribution symptoms.
A negative test is no familiar symptom reproduction.
Stop if symptoms increase sharply, paraesthesia persists, pain is not tolerated or the client becomes distressed.
Do not tap aggressively or repeatedly. Record symptom distribution and duration.
A positive Wrist Tinel’s Test may increase suspicion of carpal tunnel syndrome when symptoms are familiar and occur in the median nerve distribution. It does not confirm CTS on its own.
A negative test does not rule out CTS because Tinel’s sign has low pooled sensitivity in recent meta-analysis. Interpretation is stronger when combined with Phalen’s Test, sensory testing, motor testing, symptom history and electrodiagnostic studies when indicated.
A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of provocative manoeuvres for carpal tunnel syndrome reported pooled sensitivity of 0.45 and pooled specificity of 0.78 for Tinel’s sign across seven studies involving 748 patients. The authors concluded that Tinel’s test has low sensitivity and high specificity, and that individual provocative tests should not be used alone.
Condition or presentation: suspected carpal tunnel syndrome
Population: adults with suspected CTS across included studies
Test variation: Tinel’s sign at the wrist
Reference standard: varied, commonly electrodiagnostic testing
Sensitivity: 0.45
Specificity: 0.78
Positive likelihood ratio: not consistently stated in the accessible summary
Negative likelihood ratio: not consistently stated in the accessible summary
Key limitations: unclear and high risk of bias in included studies, variable reference standards, variable tapping technique and variable symptom criteria
A 2021 systematic review also found that diagnostic accuracy estimates for sensory and motor CTS tests vary substantially, supporting combined assessment rather than reliance on one test.
Reliability depends on tapping location, force, number of taps, wrist position, symptom criteria and whether the examiner records median nerve distribution symptoms rather than local tenderness.
Validity improves when the test is combined with symptom history, hand diagram, sensory testing, motor testing and validated clinical reasoning tools.
Common errors include tapping too hard, treating local tenderness as positive, not recording symptom distribution, failing to compare sides and using the test alone to diagnose CTS.
Limitations include low sensitivity, false negatives, symptom overlap with proximal median nerve symptoms, cervical contribution and peripheral neuropathy.
Use Wrist Tinel’s Test to document median nerve irritability at the wrist and compare it with Phalen’s Test, sensory findings, grip/pinch strength and upper limb neurodynamic tests.
Record test name, side tested, result, tapping location, symptom distribution, symptom intensity, pain score, symptom duration, comparison side, sensory findings, motor findings, confidence in result and reason for stopping.
Add related findings such as Phalen’s Test, grip strength, pinch strength, ULTT1, pronator teres testing, cervical screen and functional symptom triggers.
Phalen’s Test
Pronator Teres Syndrome Test
Upper Limb Tension Test I
Grip Strength Test
Allen Test
Wartenberg’s Sign
Arm Squeeze Test
Cervical ROM Tests
It assesses whether tapping over the median nerve at the wrist reproduces familiar median nerve symptoms.
A positive result is familiar tingling, numbness or paraesthesia into the median nerve distribution.
No. It may support suspicion but does not confirm CTS on its own.
No. Tinel’s sign has low pooled sensitivity, so a negative result does not rule out CTS.
Record side, tapping location, symptom distribution, intensity, duration and related median nerve findings.
Wrist Tinel’s Test is a median nerve percussion test.
Familiar median nerve symptoms are more meaningful than local tenderness.
Recent meta-analysis suggests low sensitivity and higher specificity.
Use it with Phalen’s, sensory, motor and history findings.
Measurz should capture symptom distribution, tapping location and related tests.
Dabbagh, A., MacDermid, J. C., Yong, J., Packham, T. L., & Grewal, R. (2021). Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22, 337.
Hegmann, K. T., et al. (2023). Diagnostic test accuracy of provocative manoeuvres for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy, 103(6), pzad029.
