Maudsley’s Test assesses whether resisted middle-finger extension reproduces familiar lateral elbow pain. It is commonly used in lateral elbow tendinopathy assessment, along with Cozen’s Test, Mill’s Test, palpation and grip strength. A 2021 systematic review found that physical examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy are commonly used, but diagnostic validity evidence is sparse; Cozen’s Test had high sensitivity, while the broader evidence base had heterogeneity and risk-of-bias limitations.
A client reports pain at the lateral elbow during gripping, lifting, typing, racquet sport or pulling tasks. Cozen’s Test may reproduce symptoms, but you may also want to assess whether resisted middle-finger extension produces familiar lateral elbow pain.
Maudsley’s Test provides a focused way to load the extensor digitorum region and common extensor origin. It does not confirm lateral elbow tendinopathy, but it can support assessment reasoning when the result matches the client’s pain location, history and related findings.
Test name: Maudsley’s Test
Also known as: Middle Finger Extension Test
Body region: Lateral elbow and wrist/finger extensor origin
Purpose: Assess lateral elbow pain response to resisted middle-finger extension
Positive finding: Familiar lateral elbow pain during resisted middle-finger extension
Negative finding: No familiar lateral elbow pain during the test
Best used with: Cozen’s Test, Mill’s Test, grip strength, palpation and functional loading
Key limitation: It does not confirm lateral elbow tendinopathy on its own
Maudsley’s Test is a lateral elbow pain provocation test. The client attempts to extend the middle finger while the examiner applies resistance. This loads the finger extensors and may reproduce lateral elbow pain in clients with lateral elbow tendinopathy-type symptoms.
The test is most meaningful when pain is familiar and located near the lateral epicondyle, not simply when the finger or forearm feels effortful.
Maudsley’s Test is used when lateral elbow tendinopathy, lateral epicondylalgia or tennis elbow is part of the assessment reasoning.
It may help assess symptoms related to gripping, keyboard use, racquet sport, climbing, lifting, tool use and repetitive finger or wrist extensor loading.
The test assesses symptom response to resisted middle-finger extension. It may load the extensor digitorum and common extensor origin, but it does not directly confirm tendon pathology.
Symptoms may also be influenced by radial nerve sensitivity, cervical referral, pain irritability, wrist extensor load sensitivity or local joint symptoms.
Maudsley’s Test may be useful for racquet sport athletes, climbers, gym clients, office workers, musicians, tradespeople and clients with lateral elbow pain during gripping or repetitive finger/wrist extension tasks.
Use when lateral elbow symptoms are present and resisted middle-finger extension is safe and relevant.
Use caution with acute trauma, suspected fracture, severe pain, recent surgery, neurological symptoms, marked swelling or inability to resist safely.
Chair or treatment table
Pain scale
Measurz recording workflow
Optional comparison-side notes
Optional grip dynamometer
Position the client sitting with the forearm supported or held comfortably.
The elbow may be extended or slightly flexed depending on the chosen protocol. The forearm is usually pronated. The wrist is neutral or slightly extended.
Stand or sit beside the tested arm.
Stabilise the client’s hand or forearm. Apply resistance over the dorsal aspect of the middle finger.
Prevent wrist, elbow, shoulder or trunk compensation.
Ask the client to extend the middle finger while you apply a downward flexion force to the finger.
Ask the client to report pain location, intensity, weakness and whether the symptom matches their usual lateral elbow pain.
A positive Maudsley’s Test is reproduction of familiar lateral elbow pain during resisted middle-finger extension.
A negative test is no familiar lateral elbow pain during resisted middle-finger extension.
Stop if pain increases sharply, symptoms spread, neurological symptoms appear or the client cannot tolerate resistance.
Use controlled resistance. Do not treat isolated finger discomfort as a positive lateral elbow finding.
A positive Maudsley’s Test may increase suspicion of lateral elbow tendinopathy when familiar lateral elbow pain is reproduced and the finding aligns with history, palpation, grip symptoms and related provocation tests. It does not confirm tendon pathology on its own.
A positive result may also reflect radial nerve sensitivity, cervical contribution, extensor muscle irritability, pain sensitivity or local joint symptoms. Interpretation is stronger when Maudsley’s Test is positive alongside Cozen’s Test, Mill’s Test and pain-free grip reduction.
A negative Maudsley’s Test may decrease suspicion when other lateral elbow tendinopathy findings are also negative. However, it does not fully exclude lateral elbow tendinopathy, especially when symptoms are load-specific, fatigue-related or sport-specific.
The most useful recent evidence comes from a 2021 systematic review of lateral elbow tendinopathy examination tests. The review included 24 studies with 1370 participants and reported that Cozen’s Test had high sensitivity of 91%, while grip strength difference between elbow flexion and extension had sensitivity of 78% to 83% and specificity of 80% to 90%. The review also stated that Cozen’s, Mill’s and Maudsley’s tests are commonly used, but reports for their diagnostic validity are sparse.
Condition or presentation: lateral elbow tendinopathy/lateral epicondylalgia
Population: people with suspected lateral elbow tendinopathy across included studies
Test variation: Maudsley’s Test/resisted middle-finger extension
Reference standard: not consistently established for Maudsley’s Test alone
Sensitivity: not clearly established for Maudsley’s Test alone in the accessible 2021 review summary
Specificity: not clearly established for Maudsley’s Test alone
Positive likelihood ratio: not available
Negative likelihood ratio: not available
Key limitations: sparse diagnostic validity evidence for Maudsley’s Test specifically, study heterogeneity, variable reference standards and risk-of-bias concerns
Because exact stand-alone values for Maudsley’s Test are not clearly supported by high-quality current evidence, the test should be used as one part of broader lateral elbow assessment rather than as a stand-alone diagnostic test.
Reliability depends on consistent finger position, elbow angle, forearm position, resistance direction, resistance level and symptom criteria.
Validity is limited by the lack of strong stand-alone diagnostic accuracy evidence. It is best understood as a symptom provocation test that may support lateral elbow tendinopathy reasoning when combined with other findings.
Common errors include resisting the wrong finger, allowing wrist extension compensation, not stabilising the forearm, failing to ask whether pain is familiar, recording finger discomfort as elbow pain and using the test as a diagnosis.
Limitations include overlap with radial nerve symptoms, extensor muscle pain, cervical referral, pain sensitivity and limited stand-alone accuracy evidence.
Use Maudsley’s Test to document lateral elbow pain response to resisted middle-finger extension. It can support load management and retesting when combined with grip strength and related lateral elbow tests.
Record test name, side tested, result as positive, negative, unclear or unable to test, pain score, symptom location, symptom quality, elbow position, forearm position, wrist position, finger tested, resistance direction, resistance level, comparison side, weakness, irritability, confidence in result and reason for stopping.
Add related findings such as Cozen’s Test, Mill’s Test, pain-free grip, grip strength, palpation, radial nerve symptoms, cervical screen and functional lifting tolerance.
Cozen’s Test
Mill’s Test
Polk’s Test
Grip Strength Test
Wrist Extension Test
Upper Limb Tension Tests
Elbow Quadrant Tests
Tinel’s Test
It assesses whether resisted middle-finger extension reproduces familiar lateral elbow pain.
A positive result is familiar lateral elbow pain during resisted middle-finger extension.
No. It may support lateral elbow tendinopathy reasoning but does not confirm the condition on its own.
Not usually. The most meaningful finding is familiar lateral elbow pain.
A negative result may reduce suspicion when other lateral elbow findings are also negative, but it does not fully exclude lateral elbow tendinopathy.
Record side, pain score, symptom location, finger tested, resistance direction, position, comparison side and related findings.
Maudsley’s Test loads the middle-finger extensors and common extensor region.
Familiar lateral elbow pain is the key positive finding.
Stand-alone diagnostic accuracy evidence is limited.
Use it with Cozen’s, Mill’s, grip testing and palpation.
Measurz should capture finger, position, resistance and symptom details.
Karanasios, S., Korakakis, V., Moutzouri, M., Drakonaki, E., Koci, K., Pantazopoulou, V., Tsepis, E., Gioftsos, G., & Malliaras, P. (2022). Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy: A systematic review. Journal of Hand Therapy, 35(4), 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.002
