The Body Temperature Test records the client’s temperature in degrees Celsius. It can help provide context when a client feels unwell, has recent illness symptoms, has been exposed to heat or cold, or needs a baseline vital sign recorded before assessment or training.
Body temperature is one of the core vital signs. It gives useful information about the body’s thermal state, but it should always be interpreted with context. A client’s temperature may vary with measurement site, time of day, age, recent exercise, environmental temperature, menstrual cycle, illness symptoms, medication and device type.
The long-standing idea that 37.0°C is the single “normal” body temperature is too simplistic. A systematic review of normal body temperature in healthy adults found that average values vary across measurement sites, with pooled means of approximately 36.6°C rectal, 36.6°C tympanic, 36.4°C urine and 36.3°C oral.
Test name: Body Temperature
Purpose: Record body temperature as a vital sign
Main score: Temperature in °C
Common methods: Oral, tympanic, temporal/forehead, axillary or rectal depending on scope and setting
Useful adult reference: Approximately 36.0–37.5°C, depending on site and context
Fever reference: Often considered around ≥38.0°C, but method and symptoms matter
Key limitation: Temperature varies by measurement site, device, time of day, environment, recent activity and symptoms.
The Body Temperature Test measures the client’s temperature using a thermometer. In Measurz, the value is recorded in degrees Celsius with notes about the measurement method and context.
Different methods do not always produce the same result. Oral, tympanic, temporal, axillary and rectal readings may differ, so the method should always be recorded and repeated consistently when tracking change.
Body temperature may be recorded to:
Establish a baseline vital sign.
Add context when a client feels unwell.
Monitor illness, heat exposure or cold exposure concerns.
Support decisions about whether to proceed, modify or stop a session.
Track temperature trends over time.
Record wellness information alongside pulse rate, respiratory rate and blood pressure.
The test measures body temperature in °C.
It does not directly measure:
The cause of illness.
Infection type.
Hydration status on its own.
Heat illness severity on its own.
Exercise readiness on its own.
Whether a client should be cleared to train.
A higher or lower reading may guide further questioning or caution, but it does not explain the cause by itself.
Body temperature recording may be useful for:
General clients.
Athletes.
Older adults.
Group testing.
Wellness screening.
Heat or cold exposure settings.
Clients who report chills, feverishness, fatigue, headache, dizziness or feeling unwell.
Use caution when a client has abnormal temperature plus concerning symptoms. In that situation, training or assessment may need to be modified or stopped, and appropriate medical advice may be recommended.
Digital thermometer.
Disposable probe covers if required.
Cleaning supplies.
Measurz app.
Notes for method, symptoms, recent activity and environment.
Select the thermometer method: oral, tympanic, temporal/forehead, axillary or another method suitable for your setting and scope.
Ask whether the client has recently exercised, consumed hot or cold drinks, been in a hot or cold environment, taken medication, or felt unwell.
Check that the thermometer is clean, working and ready. Use probe covers where required.
Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for the chosen thermometer. Keep the client still and avoid talking during the measurement when possible.
Record the temperature in °C.
Ask about chills, sweating, headache, fatigue, dizziness, cough, body aches, nausea or feeling unwell.
If the reading is unexpected or does not match the client’s presentation, repeat the measurement after a short rest or use a consistent alternative method if appropriate.
Record body temperature in °C.
Practical adult interpretation:
Around 36.0–37.5°C: commonly seen range, depending on measurement site and context.
Around ≥38.0°C: often considered fever-range, especially when symptoms are present.
Below 35.0°C: may be concerning and should be interpreted with context and symptoms.
A systematic review found that normal temperature varies by measurement site and individual factors. The pooled mean oral temperature was approximately 36.3°C, while rectal and tympanic pooled means were approximately 36.6°C.
A classic JAMA study also challenged the use of 37.0°C as a single normal value and suggested that 37.2°C in the early morning and 37.7°C overall should be considered upper limits of normal oral temperature in healthy adults aged 40 years or younger.
Evidence level: Level 1–2 — systematic review and classic clinical thermometry evidence available.
Use reference values as context, not strict pass/fail cut-offs.
Peer-reviewed evidence suggests:
Average body temperature is often below 37.0°C, depending on site.
Oral temperature in healthy adults is commonly around 36.3°C on average.
Rectal and tympanic pooled averages are closer to 36.6°C.
Oral temperature has diurnal variation, with lower values in the morning and higher values later in the day.
A systematic review of oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary temperature reported that normal ranges vary widely by measurement site, supporting the need to record the method used rather than relying on one universal value.
For Measurz interpretation, consider:
Measurement site.
Device used.
Time of day.
Recent exercise.
Hot or cold drinks.
Heat or cold exposure.
Symptoms.
Baseline temperature, if known.
Temperature reliability depends strongly on the device and measurement site.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of temporal artery thermometers found mixed accuracy compared with reference temperature methods, highlighting that non-invasive methods may not always match core temperature closely.
A systematic review in adult intensive care settings found that several non-invasive peripheral methods, including axillary and tympanic infrared methods, may underestimate invasive reference temperature, with high heterogeneity across studies.
For practical Measurz use, repeat the same method when tracking change. Do not compare oral, tympanic, forehead and axillary values as if they are interchangeable.
Common errors include:
Not recording the measurement method.
Comparing different thermometer sites directly.
Measuring soon after exercise without noting it.
Measuring soon after hot or cold drinks.
Ignoring time of day.
Not recording symptoms.
Treating one reading as a diagnosis.
Assuming 37.0°C is the only normal value.
Limitations include:
Peripheral readings may not equal core temperature.
Devices vary in accuracy.
Temperature changes with time of day and recent activity.
Fever-range readings should be interpreted with symptoms and context.
One temperature reading does not explain the cause.
Use body temperature to support:
Wellness screening.
Session safety decisions.
Heat or cold exposure monitoring.
Illness symptom context.
Baseline vital signs.
Progress notes when a client feels unwell.
If a client has an elevated or unusually low temperature with concerning symptoms, it may be appropriate to modify or stop the session and recommend appropriate medical advice.
Record:
Test name: Body Temperature.
Temperature: °C.
Measurement method: oral, tympanic, temporal/forehead, axillary or other.
Device used: thermometer type or model if relevant.
Time of day.
Recent exercise: yes/no and timing.
Hot or cold drink: yes/no and timing if oral.
Environment: hot, cold, normal or post-exposure.
Symptoms: chills, sweating, headache, fatigue, dizziness, cough, body aches or feeling unwell.
Context: pre-session, post-session, wellness screen or recovery check.
Action note: continued, modified, stopped or recommended follow-up.
Pulse Rate
Respiratory Rate
Blood Pressure
Oxygen Saturation
Wellness Screening
Heat Stress Monitoring
Recovery Monitoring
There is no single normal value. Peer-reviewed evidence suggests average body temperature is often below 37.0°C, and varies by measurement site, age, time of day and individual factors.
It can be a useful rough reference, but it should not be treated as the only normal value. A classic JAMA study argued that 37.0°C should be abandoned as a single fixed concept for normal oral temperature.
A temperature around ≥38.0°C is commonly treated as fever-range, especially when symptoms are present. The exact interpretation depends on measurement method and context.
Yes. Oral, tympanic, temporal, axillary and rectal readings can differ, so the method should always be recorded.
No. Temperature provides useful information, but it does not identify the cause of symptoms on its own.
Body temperature is a core vital sign.
37.0°C is not the only normal value.
Normal values vary by site, person, time of day and device.
Record the measurement method every time.
Interpret temperature with symptoms, environment, recent activity and baseline.
Use Measurz to record temperature, method and context consistently.
Geneva, I. I., Cuzzo, B., Fazili, T., & Javaid, W. (2019). Normal body temperature: A systematic review. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 6(4), ofz032. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz032
Mackowiak, P. A., Wasserman, S. S., & Levine, M. M. (1992). A critical appraisal of 98.6°F, the upper limit of the normal body temperature, and other legacies of Carl Reinhold August Wunderlich. JAMA, 268(12), 1578–1580. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490120092034
Sund-Levander, M., Forsberg, C., & Wahren, L. K. (2002). Normal oral, rectal, tympanic and axillary body temperature in adult men and women: A systematic literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 16(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00069.x
Geijer, H., Udumyan, R., Lohse, G., & Nilsagård, Y. (2016). Temperature measurements with a temporal scanner: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 6(3), e009509. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009509
Niven, D. J., Gaudet, J. E., Laupland, K. B., Mrklas, K. J., Roberts, D. J., & Stelfox, H. T. (2015). Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 163(10), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1150
